2020/2767(RSP)
The Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
The Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
At a glance
This is 2020/2767(RSP). Its recorded status is not supplied, and 6 linked roll-call votes appear in this research record.
Source and coverage
- Source last checked
- 28/08/2026, 06:01:26
- Record current through
- 24/08/2026
- Institution
- European Union / European Parliament
- Parliamentary term
- Depends on procedure timeline
Coverage limitations: Linked votes are only those for which the ingestion source supplies a reliable procedure relationship. Absence here is not proof that no related parliamentary activity occurred.
Read reporting and briefings ↗
- Procedure
- RSP
- Status
- In progress / not supplied
- Primary record
- Legislative Observatory ↗
Linked roll-call votes
Amendments and procedural votes are shown alongside the main/final vote when recorded.
- 2020-12-17main voteThe Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
616 for · 22 against
- 2020-12-16The Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
97 for · 583 against
- 2020-12-16The Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
115 for · 539 against
- 2020-12-16The Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
602 for · 83 against
- 2020-12-16The Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
669 for · 8 against
- 2020-12-16The Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience
585 for · 94 against